From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Traendly v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 19, 1977
373 N.E.2d 289 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued October 13, 1977

Decided December 19, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, DORTHEA E. DONALDSON, J.

Paul A. Feigenbaum, Richard L. Bond and Allen H. Brill for appellant.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (J. Lawson Brown and Ruth Kessler Toch of counsel), for State of New York, respondent.

Richard J. Leahy for claimant-respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed, with costs. We note, however, that the only issue decided on this appeal is the allocation of the award owed by the State to tenant and landlord. The parties had an opportunity to litigate this issue, and we find no error in the disposition of that issue. We do not determine the rights and obligations of the landlord and the tenant, as prescribed in subdivision (c) of paragraph 26 of the lease with respect to the application of the proceeds of the award.

Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur in memorandum; Chief Judge BREITEL taking no part.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Traendly v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 19, 1977
373 N.E.2d 289 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Traendly v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:VIVIAN M. TRAENDLY, Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 19, 1977

Citations

373 N.E.2d 289 (N.Y. 1977)
373 N.E.2d 289
402 N.Y.S.2d 394

Citing Cases

Castellano v. State of New York

There should be a reversal. It is a fundamental principle that the Court of Claims has jurisdiction, and…

Mazur v. State of New York

It is the constitutional mandate for the government to pay just compensation for property appropriated…