From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Trader v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 6, 2019
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00875-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 6, 2019)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00875-GMN-BNW

08-06-2019

COURTNEY M. TRADER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, which recommends that Plaintiff Courtney M. Trader's ("Plaintiff's") Motion to Reverse or Remand be DENIED and the Commissioner of Social Security's ("Commissioner's") Motion to Affirm be GRANTED. (See R&R 11:14-17, ECF No. 32). Plaintiff did not file an objection to Judge Weksler's R&R, and the deadline to do so has passed.

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct "any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection." Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge's report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 32), is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse or Remand, (ECF No. 21), is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion to Affirm, (ECF. No. 27), is GRANTED.

The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case.

DATED this 6 day of August, 2019.

/s/_________

Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Trader v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 6, 2019
Case No.: 2:16-cv-00875-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Trader v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY M. TRADER, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 6, 2019

Citations

Case No.: 2:16-cv-00875-GMN-BNW (D. Nev. Aug. 6, 2019)