From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tracy P. v. Sarasota County

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Mar 2, 2006
Case No. 8:05-CV-927-T-27EAJ (M.D. Fla. Mar. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 8:05-CV-927-T-27EAJ.

March 2, 2006


ORDER


Before the court is the parties' Joint Motion for Approval of Confidentiality Agreement (Dkt. 37), filed on February 27, 2006. Also before the court is the parties' Confidentiality Agreement (Dkt. 38), filed on February 27, 2006.

Upon consideration, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion for Approval of Confidentiality Agreement (Dkt. 37) is GRANTED. The court finds good cause for the issuance of this confidentiality and protective order. See Rule 26(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. Additionally, the provisions of the confidentiality agreement are specifically incorporated by reference within this order. However, in accordance with the provisions set forth in the motion and the agreement, nothing in this order shall authorize any party to file under seal, absent further court order, any confidential discovery material with the Clerk of the Court or at trial as such filings are subject to greater scrutiny due to the common law right to inspect and copy judicial records and public documents. See In re Alexander Grant Co., 820 F.2d 352, 355 (11th Cir. 1987), aff'g 629 F. Supp. 593, 597 (S.D. Fla. 1986).

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tracy P. v. Sarasota County

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Mar 2, 2006
Case No. 8:05-CV-927-T-27EAJ (M.D. Fla. Mar. 2, 2006)
Case details for

Tracy P. v. Sarasota County

Case Details

Full title:TRACY P., RIC Z., RICHARD A., GERARD O., AND RENAISSANCE MANOR, INC., a…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Citations

Case No. 8:05-CV-927-T-27EAJ (M.D. Fla. Mar. 2, 2006)