From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tracey v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 10, 1983
427 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1983)

Opinion

No. 62282.

February 10, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Stuart M. Simons, J.

Regina F. Zelonker of Scherman Zelonker, Hialeah, and Stabinski Funt, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.

G. William Bissett and Glenn P. Falk of Preddy, Kutner Hardy, Miami, for respondent.


This is a petition to review a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal reported as Tracey v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association, 414 So.2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), which we find directly conflicts with the Fourth District Court of Appeal's decision in Prygrocki v. Industrial Fire Casualty Insurance Co., 407 So.2d 345 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We have jurisdiction, article V, section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, and we quash the decision of the district court.

We recently resolved this conflict in Industrial Fire Casualty Insurance Co. v. Prygrocki, 422 So.2d 314 (Fla. 1982), where we held that a person who is "an insured" under the personal injury protection coverage of an automobile policy may claim attorney's fees under section 627.428(1), where coverage has been denied. The petitioner in this case is "an insured" under the policy and is entitled to claim attorney's fees under the statute. The decision of the district court in the instant case is quashed and this cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with this Court's decision in Prygrocki.

It is so ordered.

ADKINS, Acting C.J., and BOYD, McDONALD and EHRLICH, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Tracey v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association

Supreme Court of Florida
Feb 10, 1983
427 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1983)
Case details for

Tracey v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Association

Case Details

Full title:VALERIE TRACEY, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Feb 10, 1983

Citations

427 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1983)

Citing Cases

O'Quinn v. Seibels, Bruce Co.

Appellant would appear to be an "omnibus insured" under the terms of the policy in that the policy agrees to…