Opinion
No. 984.
May 3, 2007.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert D. Lippmann, J.), entered August 25, 2006, which, in an action arising out of a fire on plaintiffs' premises allegedly caused by defendant-respondent improperly transmitting electrical test currents, granted defendant's motion for summary judgement dismissing the complaint on the ground of plaintiffs' spoliation of the "cable tray," unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Canter Law Firm, P.C., White Plains (Nelson E. Canter of counsel), for appellants.
Richard W. Babinecz, New York (Helman R. Brook of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.
Defendant adequately demonstrates that the cable tray was necessary to a proper investigation of the cause of the fire, and that the photographs of the fire site it was allowed to take were not an adequate substitute therefor ( see Kirkland v New York City Hous. Auth., 236 AD2d 170, 173). Accordingly, the complaint was properly dismissed as a sanction for plaintiffs having discarded the cable tray before it could be examined by defendant's experts ( see id.).