From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tozzie v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01951-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Oct. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01951-REB-KMT

10-23-2012

RONALD TOZZIE, and RITA TOZZIE, Plaintiffs, v. RAY L. HUGHES, P.C., and PUEBLO LAYWERS, P.C. d/b/a BUXMAN, KWITEK, & OHLSEN, P.C., Defendants.


Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya


MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA

"Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and Response" (Doc. No. 26, filed October 19, 2012) is GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to file Plaintiff's "Amended Complaint and Jury Demand" (Doc. No. 26-2).

Further, "Defendants Pueblo Lawyers' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss" (Doc. No. 15) is DENIED without prejudice as moot based on the filing of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. See Mohammed v. Holder, No. 07-cv-2697-MSK-BNB, 2009 WL 529549, at *3 (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2009) (Because an amended complaint supercedes the original complaint, a motion to dismiss directed at the original complaint is properly denied as moot); see also Mink v. Suthers, 482 F.3d 1244, 1254 (10th Cir. 2007) ("[A]n amended complaint supercedes an original complaint and renders the original complaint without legal effect. . . . ") (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).


Summaries of

Tozzie v. Hughes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01951-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Oct. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Tozzie v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:RONALD TOZZIE, and RITA TOZZIE, Plaintiffs, v. RAY L. HUGHES, P.C., and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-01951-REB-KMT (D. Colo. Oct. 23, 2012)