From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

TOYAMA v. OAHU TRANSIT SERVICES, LTD.

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Oct 20, 2003
25951 (Haw. Oct. 20, 2003)

Opinion

25951

October 20, 2003.

APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 02-1-2986)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL


Upon review of the record, it appears that we do not have jurisdiction over Plaintiff-Appellant William Toyama's (Appellant Toyama) appeal, because Appellant Toyama did not file his July 7, 2003 notice of appeal within thirty days after entry of the June 2, 2003 judgment, as Rule 4(a)(1) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) required. The failure of Appellant Toyama to file a timely notice of appeal is a jurisdictional defect that the parties cannot waive and we cannot disregard in the exercise of judicial discretion. Bacon v. Karlin, 68 Haw. 648, 650, 727 P.2d 1127, 1129 (1986); HRAP Rule 26(b) ("[N]o court or judge or justice thereof is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements contained in Rule 4 of [the HRAP]."). Therefore, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.


Summaries of

TOYAMA v. OAHU TRANSIT SERVICES, LTD.

Supreme Court of Hawaii
Oct 20, 2003
25951 (Haw. Oct. 20, 2003)
Case details for

TOYAMA v. OAHU TRANSIT SERVICES, LTD.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM TOYAMA, Plaintiff-Appellant v. OAHU TRANSIT SERVICES, LTD.…

Court:Supreme Court of Hawaii

Date published: Oct 20, 2003

Citations

25951 (Haw. Oct. 20, 2003)