Toy v. Monticello House, Inc.

1 Citing case

  1. Hickey v. Kaser

    174 N.W.2d 33 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969)   Cited 1 times

    (2) The law in Michigan is well settled regarding a father's action for his damages sustained as a result of his son being injured in an automobile accident. When the main action of the son fails, the derivative action of the father must also fail. Arritt v. Fisher (1938), 286 Mich. 419; Kobmann v. Ross (1965), 374 Mich. 678; Simerka v. Pridemore (1968), 380 Mich. 250; Dewey v. Perkins (1940), 295 Mich. 611; Bias v. Ausbury (1963), 369 Mich. 378; Snider v. Jennings (1968), 11 Mich. App. 562, 563; Broitman v. Kohn (1969), 16 Mich. App. 400; Toy v. Monticello House, Inc. (1969), 17 Mich. App. 360. Affirmed. Costs to defendants.