From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Towsley v. Stanzak

Supreme Court of Montana
Dec 22, 2021
DA 21-0514 (Mont. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

DA 21-0514

12-22-2021

JIM L. TOWSLEY and BETTY SMITH TOWSLEY, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. DAVID P. STANZAK, MARGO L. STANZAK, CRAIG FITCH, CARYN MISKE, LAURENCE B, MILLER, JR., STEPHEN M. ZANDI, KARIN M. ZANDI, and all persons, known or unknown, claiming or who might claim any right, title, interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the personal property described in the Complaint below which is adverse to the Plaintiff's ownership or a cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto, whether such a claim or possible claim may be present or contingent, Defendants and Appellants.


ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellees' motion to substitute the appellee in this matter, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to substitute Appellee is GRANTED, and this cause shall be captioned as above.


Summaries of

Towsley v. Stanzak

Supreme Court of Montana
Dec 22, 2021
DA 21-0514 (Mont. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Towsley v. Stanzak

Case Details

Full title:JIM L. TOWSLEY and BETTY SMITH TOWSLEY, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. DAVID…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

DA 21-0514 (Mont. Dec. 22, 2021)