From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1931
156 A. 657 (N.J. 1931)

Opinion

Submitted February 13, 1931 —

Decided October 19, 1931.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 8 N.J. Mis. R. 717.

For the appellant, Charles W. Weeks.

For the respondent, McCarter English.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DALY, DONGES, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 19, 1931
156 A. 657 (N.J. 1931)
Case details for

Township of Roxbury v. Plumstead

Case Details

Full title:TOWNSHIP OF ROXBURY, APPELLANT, v. MADELINE PLUMSTEAD ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 19, 1931

Citations

156 A. 657 (N.J. 1931)
156 A. 657

Citing Cases

Slayback Van Order Co. v. Eiben

And it is worthy of note that our appellate courts have assumed the existence of such power. Fernandez v.…

Jasaitis v. Paterson

See also Moosebrugger v. Prospect Presbyterian Church, 12 N.J. 212, 214 (1953); Ryan v. St. Vincent de Paul…