From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 4, 1999
989 S.W.2d 955 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 74513.

ORDER FILED: May 4, 1999.

APPEAL FROM: THE MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. BOOKER T. SHAW, JUDGE.

David C. Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Meghan J. Stephens, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Kathianne Knaup Crane, and Lawrence E. Mooney, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief on the merits, without a hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Townsend v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
May 4, 1999
989 S.W.2d 955 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Townsend v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEANDRE TOWNSEND, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: May 4, 1999

Citations

989 S.W.2d 955 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999)