Opinion
No. 1:13-cv-1600 (TJM/TWD)
12-17-2014
DECISION and ORDER
I. INTRODUCTION
This pro se action was referred to the Hon.Therese W. Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). In he April 30, 2014 Order and Report-Recommendation (dkt. # 4), Magistrate Judge Dancks ordered that Plaintiff's in forma pauperis application (dkt. # 2) be granted for purposes of filing only; denied the motion to appoint counsel (dkt. # 3); and recommended that Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.( § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii). Plaintiff has not filed objections to the Order and Report-Recommendation, and the time to do so has expired.
II. DISCUSSION
After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Order and Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
III. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Order and Report-Recommendation for the reasons stated therein. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)-(ii).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 17, 2014
/s/_________
Hon. Thomas J. McAvoy, SUSDJ