From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. Knipper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 25, 2015
CASE NO. 1:14CV2700 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 25, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:14CV2700

11-25-2015

NATASHA TOWNSEND, Petitioner, v. MARC KNIPPER, et al., Respondent(s).


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Kathleen B. Burke ("R & R") (Doc #. 17), which recommends that Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 7) be denied without prejudice.

Under the relevant statute:

Within fourteen days after being served with a copy, any party may serve and file written objections to such proposed findings and recommendations as provided by rules of court. A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (emphasis added). The R&R was issued on November 10. It is now November 25, and Respondents have yet to file any written objection to the R&R.

The Court has reviewed the Magistrate Judge's R&R. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Respondents' Motion to Dismiss should be denied. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. # 17) and DENIES without prejudice Respondents' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Dan Aaron Polster Nov . 25 , 2015

Dan Aaron Polster

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Townsend v. Knipper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Nov 25, 2015
CASE NO. 1:14CV2700 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 25, 2015)
Case details for

Townsend v. Knipper

Case Details

Full title:NATASHA TOWNSEND, Petitioner, v. MARC KNIPPER, et al., Respondent(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 25, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 1:14CV2700 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 25, 2015)