From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. Hemela

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
1:19-cv-01054-NONE-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)

Opinion

1:19-cv-01054-NONE-BAM (PC)

09-21-2021

REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. HEMELA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS KILCREASE AND GILL TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS

BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff Rebio Ronnie Townsend (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is being detained pursuant to California's Mentally Disordered Offender (“MDO”) law, California Penal Code §§ 2970, et seq. Individuals detained under the MDO law are considered civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000).

Following the District Judge's order adopting the findings and recommendations to deny Defendants Gill and Kilcrease's motions to dismiss, this action proceeds against Defendants Hemela, Kilcrease, and Gill for the claim that the manner by which Plaintiff's forced medication has been carried out is in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 44.) Defendant Hemela filed an answer on September 8, 2020. (ECF No. 31.)

Accordingly, Defendants Gill and Kilcrease shall file answers to Plaintiff's complaint within twenty-one (21) days from the date of service of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Townsend v. Hemela

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
1:19-cv-01054-NONE-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Townsend v. Hemela

Case Details

Full title:REBIO RONNIE TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. HEMELA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

1:19-cv-01054-NONE-BAM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)