Townsend v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., No. CV-17-02386-PHX-JJT, 2019 WL 1306290, at *3 (D. Ariz. Mar. 22, 2019); see also Whyte v. Berryhill, Case No. CV 16-06158-RAO, 2018 WL 1472497, at *15 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 23, 2018) (citing Magallanes v. Bowen, 881 F.2d 747, 751 (9th Cir. 1989)) (“when a claimant's counsel poses a hypothetical that is more restrictive than the ALJ's hypothetical, the ALJ is free to accept or reject those restrictions based on the ALJ's evaluation of the evidence.