From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. Clemons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 4, 2013
No. 12 Civ. 03434 (RJS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2013)

Opinion

No. 12 Civ. 03434 (RJS)(SN)

03-04-2013

FLOYD TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CLEMONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:

Plaintiff filed a Complaint on April 30, 201fi seeking injunctive relief and monetary damages relating to the allegedly unconstitutional cone itions he experienced while in the custody of the New York City Department of Correction ("DOC"). The three named Defendants are William demons, Warden of the Robert N. Davoren Center ("RNDC"), Mr. Gumsdere, Deputy Warden of Security at RNDC, and the City of New York.

On June 11, 2013, this matter was referred to Magistrate Judge James L. Cott for general pretrial supervision and dispositive motions requiring a report and recommendation. On July 21, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint. Despite Judge Con's reminder and extension of time, Plaintiff never filed any opposition to Defendants' motion. On November 8, 2012, the case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Sarah Netbum's docket. On January 30, 2013, Judge Netbum issued a Report and Recommendation (the "Report") concerning Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint.

In her Report, Judge Netburn advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No party has filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has expired. See Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir. 1993). When no objections to a report and recommendation are made, the court may adopt the report if there is no clear error on the face of the record. A dee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005); La Torres v. Walker, 216 F. Supp. 2d 157, 159 (S.D.N.Y, 2000).

After reviewing the record, the Court finds that Judge Netburn's well-reasoned Report is not facially erroneous. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report in its entirety and, for the reasons set forth therein, GRANTS Defendants' motion to dismiss the Complaint with prejudice, but grants Plaintiff leave to reopen the case within 30 days by filing an amended complaint that addresses the defects in his original complaint.

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at Doc. No. 12. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2013

New York, New York

____________

RICHARD J. SULLIVAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CC: Floyd Townsend

11A4604

Great Meadow Correctional Facility

Box 51

Comstock, NY 12821-0051


Summaries of

Townsend v. Clemons

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 4, 2013
No. 12 Civ. 03434 (RJS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Townsend v. Clemons

Case Details

Full title:FLOYD TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM CLEMONS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 4, 2013

Citations

No. 12 Civ. 03434 (RJS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Avanzato

However, "the violation of [facility] Standards does not, on its own, violate a prisoner's constitutional…

Chapman-Green v. City of New York

If he chooses not to, the Court will decide the unopposed motion. See Townsend v. Clemons, No. 12-CV-03434,…