From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsend v. Brooks Sports, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 9, 2022
No. 2021-2143 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2143

06-09-2022

HERBERT E. TOWNSEND, Appellant v. BROOKS SPORTS, INC., Appellee

Steven John Hampton, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by Herbert D. Hart, III. Darren Edward Donnelly, Polsinelli LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee.


This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00577.

Steven John Hampton, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd., Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by Herbert D. Hart, III.

Darren Edward Donnelly, Polsinelli LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is

Ordered and Adjudged:

Reyna, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Townsend v. Brooks Sports, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 9, 2022
No. 2021-2143 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Townsend v. Brooks Sports, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HERBERT E. TOWNSEND, Appellant v. BROOKS SPORTS, INC., Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 9, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-2143 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 9, 2022)