From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townsel v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Mar 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:20-CV-18-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 3, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:20-CV-18-SA-DAS

03-03-2020

ZERIC J. TOWNSEL PLAINTIFF v. ALAN WHITE and WILLIAM MALISCH DEFENDANTS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 3, 2020, Zeric Townsel filed a pro se Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis [2]. The Magistrate Judge assigned to this case entered a Report and Recommendation [4] on February 12, 2020 recommending that the Plaintiff's pro se motion be denied.

This Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [4] without change and the Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED for the reasons discussed in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

SO ORDERED this, the 3rd day of March, 2020.

/s/ Sharion Aycock

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Townsel v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Mar 3, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:20-CV-18-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 3, 2020)
Case details for

Townsel v. White

Case Details

Full title:ZERIC J. TOWNSEL PLAINTIFF v. ALAN WHITE and WILLIAM MALISCH DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 3, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:20-CV-18-SA-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 3, 2020)