From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townley v. Import Chemical Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

May, 1916.

Present — Clarke, P.J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Smith and Page, JJ.


Upon the complaint as framed, we are satisfied that there is but one cause of action attempted to be set forth. Upon the question whether there is a cause of action which would withstand demurrer, we express no opinion. (See Matter of Bouker Contracting Co. v. Calahan Contracting Co., 92 Misc. Rep. 241; affd., on opinion of Lehman, J., 172 App. Div. 906.) The order appealed from is, therefore, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.


Summaries of

Townley v. Import Chemical Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1916
173 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Townley v. Import Chemical Company

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED H. TOWNLEY, as Receiver of the Property of EDGAR C. RIEBE COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1916

Citations

173 App. Div. 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
158 N.Y.S. 1133