From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townhouse Co. v. Plotkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 2004
12 A.D.3d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4671

November 18, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Beeler, J.), entered February 23, 2004, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff's motion insofar as it sought partial summary judgment on its first three causes of action and denied defendants' cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Friedman, Marlow and Sweeny, JJ.


Under the facts of this case, reasonable minds might differ as to whether the changes in elevator service rose to the level of constructive eviction. Whether the landlord's conduct was of such character as to justify the tenants' abandonment of the premises is a question for the trier of facts ( see Hayden Co. v. Kehoe, 177 App Div 734). We have considered the parties' remaining contentions for affirmative relief and find them without merit.


Summaries of

Townhouse Co. v. Plotkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 2004
12 A.D.3d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Townhouse Co. v. Plotkin

Case Details

Full title:TOWNHOUSE COMPANY, LLC, Appellant-Respondent, v. DAVID PLOTKIN, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2004

Citations

12 A.D.3d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
784 N.Y.S.2d 365

Citing Cases

NYC Goetz Realty Corp. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Catterson and Malone, JJ. Whether a landlord's renovation work…

1350 Broadway Assoc, LLC v. Tradings.net, Inc.

Ring v The Printmaking Workshop, Inc., 70 AD3d 480, 480-481 (1st Dept 2010). Even though, in most instances,…