From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townes v. Potter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1780 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1780

01-13-2012

KAREN A. TOWNES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this _ day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14), Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15), and the parties respective Responses in Opposition thereto (Doc. 16), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case as closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

___________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker , U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Townes v. Potter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 13, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1780 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Townes v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:KAREN A. TOWNES, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 13, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1780 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Fed. Express Corp.

FedEx's Acceptable Conduct policy provides that employees may face “disciplinary action, up to and including…