From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Townes v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 4, 2022
382 N.C. 681 (N.C. 2022)

Summary

holding that "the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value"

Summary of this case from Mole v. City of Durham

Opinion

No. 66PA21

11-04-2022

Pia TOWNES v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

North Carolina Justice Center, by Jason A. Pikler and Carlene McNulty; and J. Jerome Hartzell for plaintiff-appellee. Jon Berkelhammer, Joseph D. Hammond, Greensboro, Michelle A. Liguori, Raleigh, and D. Scott Hazelgrove II, for defendant-appellant. Legal Aid of North Carolina, by Celia Pistolis, Raleigh, and Kathryn A. Sabbeth; Center for Responsible Lending, by Nadine Chabrier; Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy, Inc., by Karen Fisher Moskowitz; Financial Protection Law Center, by Maria D. McIntyre ; Pisgah Legal Services, by Marjorie Maynard; and National Association of Consumer Advocates, by Adrian M. Lapas, Goldsboro, and Suzanne Begnoche, Chapel Hill, for amici curiae. Richard P. Cook, PLLC, Wilmington, by Richard P. Cook, for North Carolina Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Coalition, amicus curiae. Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, by Caren D. Enloe and Landon G. Van Winkle, Raleigh, for North Carolina Creditors Bar Association, amicus curiae. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Daniel P. Mosteller, Deputy General Counsel, and M. Lynne Weaver, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina, amicus curiae.


North Carolina Justice Center, by Jason A. Pikler and Carlene McNulty; and J. Jerome Hartzell for plaintiff-appellee.

Jon Berkelhammer, Joseph D. Hammond, Greensboro, Michelle A. Liguori, Raleigh, and D. Scott Hazelgrove II, for defendant-appellant.

Legal Aid of North Carolina, by Celia Pistolis, Raleigh, and Kathryn A. Sabbeth; Center for Responsible Lending, by Nadine Chabrier; Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy, Inc., by Karen Fisher Moskowitz; Financial Protection Law Center, by Maria D. McIntyre ; Pisgah Legal Services, by Marjorie Maynard; and National Association of Consumer Advocates, by Adrian M. Lapas, Goldsboro, and Suzanne Begnoche, Chapel Hill, for amici curiae.

Richard P. Cook, PLLC, Wilmington, by Richard P. Cook, for North Carolina Consumer Bankruptcy Rights Coalition, amicus curiae.

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, LLP, by Caren D. Enloe and Landon G. Van Winkle, Raleigh, for North Carolina Creditors Bar Association, amicus curiae.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by Daniel P. Mosteller, Deputy General Counsel, and M. Lynne Weaver, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 Justice ERVIN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Piro v. McKeever , 369 N.C. 291, 794 S.E.2d 501 (2016) (per curiam) (affirming a Court of Appeals opinion without precedential value by an equally divided vote).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Townes v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Nov 4, 2022
382 N.C. 681 (N.C. 2022)

holding that "the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value"

Summary of this case from Mole v. City of Durham
Case details for

Townes v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC

Case Details

Full title:Pia TOWNES v. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Nov 4, 2022

Citations

382 N.C. 681 (N.C. 2022)
878 S.E.2d 797

Citing Cases

Mole v. City of Durham

This Court has done so just shy of 100 times in the last fifty years, most recently this past November.…