From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vernon Towner v. Michael Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 23, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2823 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-2823 LKK EFB P.

December 23, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request counsel voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The court finds that there are no exceptional circumstances in this case.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's December 11, 2009 request for appointment of counsel is denied.


Summaries of

Vernon Towner v. Michael Knowles

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 23, 2009
No. CIV S-08-2823 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2009)
Case details for

Vernon Towner v. Michael Knowles

Case Details

Full title:VERNON TOWNER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL KNOWLES, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 23, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-08-2823 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilbanks v. Tappen

Thus, the denial, rejection, or cancellation of a grievance does not constitute a due process violation. See,…

Wilbanks v. Tappen

Thus, the denial, rejection, or cancellation of a grievance does not constitute a due process violation. See,…