From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Towne Buick-Opel, Inc. v. London Motors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

January 24, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Green, O'Donnell and Pine, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: There are ambiguities in the terminology used in the conditional sales contract. Since a determination of the intent of the parties depends upon the credibility of extrinsic evidence, or on a choice among reasonable inferences to be drawn from extrinsic evidence, there are triable issues of fact raised which preclude granting summary judgment (Hartford Acc. Indem. Co. v Wesolowski, 33 N.Y.2d 169, 172; Mallad Constr. Corp. v County Fed. Sav. Loan Assn., 32 N.Y.2d 285, 291).


Summaries of

Towne Buick-Opel, Inc. v. London Motors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 24, 1986
116 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Towne Buick-Opel, Inc. v. London Motors

Case Details

Full title:TOWNE BUICK-OPEL, INC., Respondent, v. LONDON MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 24, 1986

Citations

116 A.D.2d 1000 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)