Opinion
705 CA 17–02196
05-09-2018
In the Matter of TOWN OF LERAY, Petitioner–Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF EVANS MILLS and Village of Evans Mills Planning Board, Respondents–Defendants–Respondents–Appellants.
HRABCHAK & GEBO, P.C., WATERTOWN (MARK G. GEBO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT. BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRODY D. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS–DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.
HRABCHAK & GEBO, P.C., WATERTOWN (MARK G. GEBO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–PLAINTIFF–APPELLANT–RESPONDENT.
BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, SYRACUSE (BRODY D. SMITH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS–DEFENDANTS–RESPONDENTS–APPELLANTS.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.
ORDER
Appeal and cross appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court, Jefferson County ( James P. McClusky, J.), entered March 3, 2017 in a CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action. The decision found that the zoning laws of respondents-defendants do not apply to petitioner-plaintiff's construction of a barn but do apply to the construction of a new entrance from Willow Street.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal and cross appeal are unanimously dismissed without costs (see Kuhn v. Kuhn, 129 A.D.2d 967, 967, 514 N.Y.S.2d 284 [4th Dept. 1987] ).