Opinion
Argued October 30, 1925 —
Decided February 1, 1926.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 102.
For the appellant, Charles H. Stewart.
For the respondent, William Greenfield.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.