From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Town of Deerpark v. City of Port Jervis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

June 9, 1997

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter C. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order dated July 3, 1996, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated October 15, 1996, made upon renewal; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 15, 1996, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The Town did not make out all of the elements necessary to obtain a preliminary injunction in that it did not show the likelihood of success on the merits (see, Grant Co. v. Srogi, 52 N.Y.2d 496, 517). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for a preliminary injunction.

Miller, J.P., Joy, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Town of Deerpark v. City of Port Jervis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 9, 1997
240 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Town of Deerpark v. City of Port Jervis

Case Details

Full title:TOWN OF DEERPARK, Appellant, v. CITY OF PORT JERVIS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 9, 1997

Citations

240 A.D.2d 487 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
659 N.Y.S.2d 764

Citing Cases

Kahn Prop. Owner, LLC v. Fruchthandler

We have considered the remaining arguments and caselaw submitted by defense counsel and although they have…

Indian Harbor Ins. Co. v. Daikin Am., Inc.

The decision to grant or deny a preliminary injunction rests in the sound discretion of the Supreme Court"…