Opinion
Argued January 25, 2000
March 9, 2000
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the defendant may not arbitrate any contractual disputes with the plaintiff that are not set forth in its notice of claim, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gerard, J.), entered October 2, 1998, which granted the defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint and denied its cross motion to convert the defendant's motion to one for summary judgment and for summary judgment in its favor, and (2) an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court, entered December 30, 1998, which, inter alia, dismissed the complaint.
Goldberg Connolly, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (David E. Wolff and Ralph Pernick of counsel), for appellant.
Berman Paley Goldstein Kannry, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Alvin Goldstein of counsel), and Gutman Gutman, Port Washington, N Y (S. Mac Gutman of counsel), for respondent (one brief filed).
DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.
The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248 ). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the order and judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1]).
The Supreme Court properly determined that this action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata (see, Smith v. Russell Sage Coll., 54 N.Y.2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v. Reid, 45 N.Y.2d 24 ).
RITTER, J.P., ALTMAN, KRAUSMAN, and McGINITY, JJ., concur.