From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Towle v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 29, 1951
278 App. Div. 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)

Opinion

June 29, 1951.

Appeal from Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County.

Present — Foster, P.J., Heffernan, Deyo, Bergan and Coon, JJ.


Plaintiff leased a one-family residential house from the individual defendant, who later conveyed the premises to the corporate defendant. As lessee plaintiff agreed to make any necessary repairs. He was injured by reason of an alleged defective condition of a sunken pit in the cellar. The complaint was dismissed on the theory that plaintiff was in full control and possession of the premises. Plaintiff urges that under the Federal Emergency Price Control Act of 1942 (U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 901 et seq.) a duty was cast upon the landlord to make repairs. Assuming this to be a fact it does not supersede the common-law rule of nonliability in this State where tenant has full control otherwise ( Cullings v. Goetz, 256 N.Y. 287). The control contemplated by the rule is beyond a mere duty to repair. Nor did any violation of the Price Control Act, under the circumstances alleged, give rise to an action for negligence or nuisance. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs.


Summaries of

Towle v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 29, 1951
278 App. Div. 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)
Case details for

Towle v. Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:ALEX TOWLE, Appellant, v. SOL KAPLAN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 29, 1951

Citations

278 App. Div. 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1951)