From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toussaint-Hill v. Montereau in Warren Woods

United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Oct 29, 2007
Case No. 07-CV-179 GKF/SAJ (N.D. Okla. Oct. 29, 2007)

Summary

holding that, under the circumstances presented, production of financial information "is appropriate only after a dispositive ruling on the issue of punitive damages"

Summary of this case from CMI Roadbuilding, Inc. v. SpecSys, Inc.

Opinion

Case No. 07-CV-179 GKF/SAJ.

October 29, 2007


OPINION AND ORDER


Comes on for determination Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. # 20]. Hearing was held on September 25, 2007, following which the court took under advisement the motion as it related to the issues raised in Interrogatory # 18 and Requests for Production #'s 1, 2 and 4. Defendant Montereau was directed to file supplemental brief on those issues which has been filed. The court, having considered the briefs and argument of the parties, hereby finds as follows.

In regard to Interrogatory # 18, the Motion to Compel is granted in part and denied in part. Oklahoma law requires the production of financial information where a request for punitive damages is pled. See Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc., 2007 WL 950282 (D.Kan. March 25, 2007). However the court finds production of this financial information is appropriate only after a dispositive ruling on the issue of punitive damages. Should the court allow the claim for punitive damages to proceed, Defendant is directed to produce to Plaintiff one balance sheet showing net worth for the year 2006 within 20 days of the court's order allowing Plaintiff's punitive damages claim to proceed.

In regard to Requests for Production #'s 1, 2 and 4, the Motion to Compel is denied. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that the statistical information would permit any inference of discrimination directed toward the Plaintiff. The court finds the probative value of such evidence is minimal compared to the cost of production. Defendant has voluntarily produced the information as it relates to Plaintiff's work unit.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. # 20] is granted in part and denied in part as set forth herein.


Summaries of

Toussaint-Hill v. Montereau in Warren Woods

United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Oct 29, 2007
Case No. 07-CV-179 GKF/SAJ (N.D. Okla. Oct. 29, 2007)

holding that, under the circumstances presented, production of financial information "is appropriate only after a dispositive ruling on the issue of punitive damages"

Summary of this case from CMI Roadbuilding, Inc. v. SpecSys, Inc.
Case details for

Toussaint-Hill v. Montereau in Warren Woods

Case Details

Full title:VICTORIA TOUSSAINT-HILL, Plaintiff, v. MONTEREAU IN WARREN WOODS, KELLY…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 29, 2007

Citations

Case No. 07-CV-179 GKF/SAJ (N.D. Okla. Oct. 29, 2007)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Mid Continent Cabinetry, Inc. v. George Koch Sons, Inc., 130 F.R.D. 149, 151 (D. Kan. 1990). "Oklahoma law…

Sanders v. Turn Key Health Clinics

e, courts have routinely held that discovery of the defendant's wealth should be limited to the current…