Opinion
No. 558 CA 21-00921
08-04-2022
THE LONG LAW FIRM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JAMES AUSTIN LONG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., ROCHESTER (MATTHEW J. KAISER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
THE LONG LAW FIRM, PLLC, SYRACUSE (JAMES AUSTIN LONG OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
WILLIAM MATTAR, P.C., ROCHESTER (MATTHEW J. KAISER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND BANNISTER, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oswego County (Gregory R. Gilbert, J.), entered January 27, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendants insofar as it sought to compel production of the cell phone of Anthony J. Farrell.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Tousant v Aragona ([appeal No. 2] - A.D.3d - [Aug. 4, 2022] [4th Dept 2022]).