From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tournahu v. Flynn

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 23, 2022
22-cv-03220-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-03220-EMC

08-23-2022

ROBERT TOURNAHU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PEGGY FLYNN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

EDWARDM. CHEN United States District Judge

On July 22, 2022, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state claims. See Docket No. 54. Plaintiffs' opposition to the motion was due on August 5, 2022. To date, Plaintiffs have not opposed the motion, nor otherwise responded to the motion.

Thus, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to show cause why Defendants' motion to dismiss should not be granted for Plaintiffs' failure to oppose.

Plaintiffs will have 14 days from entry of this order to file an opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss. Failure to file an opposition within this time frame will result in dismissal with prejudice of all claims against the defendants named herein. Should an opposition be filed, Defendants have 7 days from the date Plaintiffs file their opposition to reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tournahu v. Flynn

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 23, 2022
22-cv-03220-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Tournahu v. Flynn

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT TOURNAHU, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PEGGY FLYNN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2022

Citations

22-cv-03220-EMC (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2022)