From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Touchton v. Fid. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 26, 2012
Case No: 10-12965 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 10-12965

10-26-2012

DAVID TOUCHTON and DEBRA TOUCHTON, Plaintiffs, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.


Hon. Mark A. Randon


ORDER PERMITTING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING FROM

PLAINTIFF AND CONVERTING FIDELITY'S MOTION IN

LIMINE (DKT. 41) INTO A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Fidelity National Property and Insurance Company's ("Fidelity") motion in limine (Dkt. 41). By way of procedural background, Fidelity first raised the legal arguments presented in its motion in limine in a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 29). The Court, however, struck Fidelity's motion from the docket since it was filed past the dispositive motion cut-off. The Court's order (Dkt. 36) striking Fidelity's motion for summary judgment and denying Fidelity's motion for leave to file a tardy dispositive motion (Dkt. 30) is hereby VACATED, and Fidelity's motion for leave to file a dispositive motion is instead GRANTED.

Rule 56(b) states that "[u]nless a different time is set by local rule or the court orders otherwise, a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of all discovery" (emphasis added). Through this order, the Court is ordering "otherwise," and construing Fidelity's motion in limine as a motion for summary judgment.

More particularly, the Court is putting Plaintiffs on notice that it intends to treat Fidelity's motion in limine (Dkt. 41) as a motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. If Plaintiffs wish to file any additional briefing with the Court, or present the Court with any additional exhibits, Plaintiffs must do so WITHIN TWENTY ONE (21) DAYS of the date of this order. If Plaintiffs do not intend to file any additional briefing or exhibits in response to Fidelity's motion in limine (which, again, is now a motion for summary judgment), Plaintiffs should inform the Court of their decision to stand on their existing response (Dkt. 42) as soon as that decision is made.

SO ORDERED.

_________________

MARK A. RANDON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the parties of record on this date, October 26, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Melody Miles

Case Manager Magistrate Judge Mark A. Randon

(313) 234-5542


Summaries of

Touchton v. Fid. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Oct 26, 2012
Case No: 10-12965 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Touchton v. Fid. Nat'l Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID TOUCHTON and DEBRA TOUCHTON, Plaintiffs, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 26, 2012

Citations

Case No: 10-12965 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 26, 2012)