From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Totton v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 8, 2021
2:21-cv-01907 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01907

11-08-2021

ANGEL TOTTON, as guardian of minor child, K.T., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, OFFICER LAWRENCE, & UNKNOWN OFFICERS, Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER COMING BEFORE THE COURT ON PETITIONERS MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE PRACTICE PRO HAC VICE UNDER THE PROVISION OF LOCAL RULE 180(b)(2). IT IS SO ORDERED, PETITIONER'S MOTION IS GRANTED.


Summaries of

Totton v. City of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 8, 2021
2:21-cv-01907 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2021)
Case details for

Totton v. City of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL TOTTON, as guardian of minor child, K.T., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 8, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01907 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 8, 2021)