Opinion
Case No. 11-12485
03-19-2012
Davis Totten, Plaintiff, v. C. Caldwell, et al., Defendants.
Honorable Sean F. Cox
ORDER ADOPTING
FEBRUARY 21, 2012 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff Davis Totten ("Totten") filed this suit, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against several Defendants who are officials at the Ryan Road Correctional Facility in Detroit, Michigan. The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Mark Randon for determination of all non-dispositive motions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Report and Recommendation pursuant to § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C).
Totten filed a motion seeking to make photocopies of religious materials (Docket Entry No.4). In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") issued on February 21, 2012, Magistrate Judge Randon recommended that this Court deny the motion as moot. (Docket Entry No. 23).
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b), a party objecting to the recommended disposition of a matter by a Magistrate Judge must filed objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. "The district judge to whom the case is assigned shall make a de novo determination upon the record, or after additional evidence, of any portion of the magistrate judge's disposition to which specific written objection has been made." Id.
The time for filing objections to the R&R has expired and the docket reflects that neither party has filed objections to the R&R.
The Court hereby ADOPTS the February 21, 2012 R&R. IT IS ORDERED that Totten's Motion (Docket Entry No. 4) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________
Sean F. Cox
U. S. District Court Judge
I hereby certify that on March 19, 2012, the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record by electronic means and upon Davis Totten by First Class Mail at the address below:
Davis Totten
182985
Special Alternative Incarceration
18901 Waterloo Road
Shelsea, MI 48118
Jennifer Hernandez
Case Manager