Opinion
2:22-cv-01756 -RFB-DJA
01-23-2023
BONNIE TOTH, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS & HARRIS LTD, Defendant.
GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ. KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON & WATSON, CHTD. Attorneys for Defendant Harris & Harris, LTD.
GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ. KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON & WATSON, CHTD. Attorneys for Defendant Harris & Harris, LTD.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [FOURTH REQUEST]
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
COMES NOW, Defendant Harris & Harris, Ltd. (“H&H”), by and through its undersigned counsel, GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ. of KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON & WATSON, CHTD., and Plaintiff Bonnie Toth, by and through her undersigned counsel, GEORGE HAINES, ESQ. and GERARDO AVALOS, ESQ. of FREEDOM LAW FIRM, LLC, and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to February 3, 2023 for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint.
This is the parties' fourth request for an extension because the parties are continuing to negotiate towards a settlement and resolution. An additional two weeks will allow for the parties to work toward amicably resolving this matter. The parties do not contemplate another request accordingly.
This request is made in good faith and not for delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
BASED UPON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant shall have until February 3, 2023 in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in the action entitled Bonnie Toth v. Harris & Harris, Ltd., United States District Court, District of Nevada, Court Case No. 2:22-cv-01756.
IT IS SO ORDERED.