Opinion
2:22-cv-01756 -RFB-DJA
01-09-2023
BONNIE TOTH, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS & HARRIS LTD, Defendant.
FREEDOM LAW FIRM, LLC George Haines, Esq. Gerardo Avalos, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON & WATSON, CHTD. Gina M. Mushmeche, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant
FREEDOM LAW FIRM, LLC George Haines, Esq. Gerardo Avalos, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff
KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON & WATSON, CHTD. Gina M. Mushmeche, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [THIRD REQUEST]
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
COMES NOW, Defendant Harris & Harris, Ltd. (“H&H”), by and through its undersigned counsel, GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ. of KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON & WATSON, CHTD., and Plaintiff Bonnie Toth, by and through her undersigned counsel, GEORGE HAINES, ESQ. and GERARDO AVALOS, ESQ. of FREEDOM LAW FIRM, LLC, and hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to January 20, 2023 for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint.
This is the parties' third request for an extension because the parties are actively negotiating to resolve this matter. An additional two weeks will allow for the parties to work toward amicably resolving this matter. The parties do not contemplate another request accordingly.
This request is made in good faith and not for delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
BASED UPON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Defendant shall have until January 20, 2023 in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in the action entitled Bonnie Toth v. Harris & Harris, Ltd., United States District Court, District of Nevada, Court Case No. 2:22-cv-01756.
IT IS SO ORDERED.