Opinion
2:22-cv-01756 -RFB-DJA
11-10-2022
BONNIE TOTH, Plaintiff, v. HARRIS & HARRIS LTD, Defendant.
FREEDOM LAW FIRM GERARDO AVALOS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15171 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bonnie Toth KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON WATSON & ZEPPENFELD, CHTD. GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10411 Attorneys for Defendant, Harris & Harris, LTD.
FREEDOM LAW FIRM GERARDO AVALOS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 15171 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bonnie Toth
KRAVITZ SCHNITZER JOHNSON WATSON & ZEPPENFELD, CHTD. GINA M. MUSHMECHE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10411 Attorneys for Defendant, Harris & Harris, LTD.
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
[FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION]
DANIEL J. ALBREGTS, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
COMES NOW, Defendant, HARRIS & HARRIS, LTD. (“Defendant”), and Plaintiff, BONNIE TOTH, by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and agree to extend the deadline to November 30, 2022 for Defendant to answer or otherwise plead in response to Plaintiff's Complaint.
This is Defendant's first request for an extension, which it requested from Plaintiff in order to allow Defendant additional time to investigate the factual allegations of the Complaint and to explore settlement possibilities. Plaintiff has no opposition to Defendant's request for an extension.
This request is made in good faith and not for delay. No additional requests for extensions are contemplated.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.