From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toscano v. Terhune

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV S-02-2184 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-2184 MCE EFB P

10-19-2011

ROSS TOSCANO, Petitioner, v. C. A. TERHUNE, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order dated March 10, 2003, before an answer was filed, this matter was administratively stayed to allow petitioner the opportunity to exhaust a claim in state court. On August 26, 2011, petitioner was ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. On August 29, 2011, petitioner filed a request for voluntary dismissal of this action on the grounds that he was granted habeas relief in state court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Toscano v. Terhune

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2011
No. CIV S-02-2184 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Toscano v. Terhune

Case Details

Full title:ROSS TOSCANO, Petitioner, v. C. A. TERHUNE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-02-2184 MCE EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)