From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Toscano v. New York City Transportation Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 7, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Posner, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On appeal, the plaintiffs contend, inter alia, that the jury verdict in favor of the defendant should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence. We disagree. It is well settled that fact-finding is the province of the jury, and a verdict in favor of the defendant should not be set aside unless "`the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence'" (Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134; see also, Dingle v. Virga, 195 A.D.2d 538). Contrary to the plaintiffs' assertions, the jury's determination that the defendant was not negligent is supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence. In this regard, we note that the jury could have credited the bus driver's testimony that he did not see any traffic approaching from the east before he started to cross the intersection where the accident occurred. He claimed that he was traveling at a slow rate of speed, and did not see the left-turning vehicle until it was three or four feet away from him, thus forcing him to abruptly apply his brakes in order to avoid a collision. The bus driver was not required to anticipate that the left-turning vehicle would cross over into his lane while he was proceeding through the intersection (see, McGraw v. Ranieri, 202 A.D.2d 725). Under these circumstances, the jury could have reasonably concluded that the left-turning vehicle was at fault for the accident because it attempted to cross in front of the bus when it was hazardous to do so, and that the bus driver did not contribute to the accident (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141; Moller v. Lieber, 156 A.D.2d 434). Bracken, J.P., Santucci, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Toscano v. New York City Transportation Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 7, 1994
209 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Toscano v. New York City Transportation Auth

Case Details

Full title:JOHN J. TOSCANO et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSPORTATION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 7, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 403 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 733

Citing Cases

Spivak v. Erickson

to judgment as a matter of law dismissing the cross claims asserted against them by the defendant Deborah…

Rahman v. Smith

Having credited the defendant's testimony that the light was in his favor, and further having credited the…