Opinion
Argued May 24, 1939 —
Decided September 22, 1939.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 121 N.J.L. 604.
For the appellants, Emil Neblo.
For the respondent, William J. Egan ( Stephen J. Lorenz, of counsel).
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, BODINE, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, JJ. 11.
For reversal — PERSKIE, J. 1.