From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torros v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 30, 1982
415 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-138.

June 30, 1982.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Michael E. Raiden, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellants.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William E. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellants Antonio and Alberto Torros challenge a special condition of their probation providing: "If found to be an illegal alien, you are to be deported to Cuba." They correctly point out that deportation is a federal matter, see Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973). The trial court thus had no authority to order their deportation, and the provision therefor must be stricken. The trial court may, however, recommend to the appropriate federal authorities that appellants be deported if the court deems it advisable.

Accordingly, the special condition that appellants be deported if found to be illegal aliens is stricken from the order placing them on probation. The order is otherwise affirmed.

HOBSON, Acting C.J., and BOARDMAN and OTT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Torros v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 30, 1982
415 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Torros v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO TORROS AND ALBERTO TORROS, APPELLANTS, v. STATE OF FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 30, 1982

Citations

415 So. 2d 908 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

State v. Silvera

See, e.g., People v. Antonio–Antimo, 29 P.3d 298, 302–03 (Colo.2000); Torros v. State, 415 So.2d 908, 908…

Montejo v. Martin Memorial Medical Center, Inc.

That argument, however, only weakens the hospital's position on a different issue, which is whether the trial…