From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jul 15, 2015
Case No. 6:14-cv-792-Orl-37GJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 6:14-cv-792-Orl-37GJK

07-15-2015

JUAN TORRES, Plaintiff, v. EFRAIN TORRES, SR.; and J. RIOS ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Doc. 27), filed July 14, 2015.

In a prior Order, the Court denied the parties' first Joint Motion to Dismiss this FLSA action (Doc. 25), and it granted the parties leave to seek dismissal of Plaintiff's claims without prejudice (Doc. 26, p. 6 ("Prior Order")). The parties sought such relief in a new Joint Motion to Dismiss, which they filed on July 14, 2015. (See Doc. 27 ("Joint Motion").) In view of the parties' plain intention to resolve this action by dismissal without prejudice, and the fact that all the parties who have appeared in this action have signed the Joint Motion through counsel, the Court will construe the new Joint Motion as an effective stipulation of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The Court again reminds the parties that any settlement they may have entered concerning Plaintiff's FLSA claims is unenforceable because the Court has not conducted a fairness review in accordance with Lynn's Food.

In the Prior Order, the Court noted that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) provides no avenue to avoid the fairness review that is required by Lynn's Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350 (11th Cir. 1982). (See Doc. 26, p. 4.) Thus, to the extent the new Joint Motion is premised on Rule 41(a)(2), it is due to be denied. --------

CONCLUSION

It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. The Joint Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Doc. 25) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

a. The Joint Motion (Doc. 27) is GRANTED in accordance with Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

b. The Joint Motion (Doc. 27) is DENIED to the extent it seeks dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2).

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to cancel all pending deadlines and CLOSE this file.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Orlando, Florida, on July 15, 2015.

/s/_________

ROY B. DALTON JR.

United States District Judge
Copies: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Torres v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Jul 15, 2015
Case No. 6:14-cv-792-Orl-37GJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Torres v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:JUAN TORRES, Plaintiff, v. EFRAIN TORRES, SR.; and J. RIOS ENTERPRISES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 15, 2015

Citations

Case No. 6:14-cv-792-Orl-37GJK (M.D. Fla. Jul. 15, 2015)