From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Labs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued June 29, 1999

October 18, 1999

Appeal by the plaintiffs from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.).


ORDERED that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Owen at the Supreme Court in the order dated June 9, 1998; and it is further,

ORDERED that the respondent is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501[a][1]).

JOY, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SCHMIDT, and SMITH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Torres v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Labs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1999
265 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Torres v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Labs

Case Details

Full title:DONNA TORRES, et al., appellants, v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CLINICAL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 859