From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Rule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2019
Case No. 5:18-cv-01443 PA (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5:18-cv-01443 PA (AFM)

11-14-2019

ANGELO YSIDRO TORRES, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL RULE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and Objections have not been received.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that

(1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted;

(2) plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied;

(3) defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted;

(4) all claims against defendant in his official capacity are dismissed; and

(5) that judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. DATED: November 14, 2019

/s/_________

PERCY ANDERSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Torres v. Rule

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2019
Case No. 5:18-cv-01443 PA (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2019)
Case details for

Torres v. Rule

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO YSIDRO TORRES, Plaintiff, v. SAMUEL RULE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2019

Citations

Case No. 5:18-cv-01443 PA (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2019)