From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Rothstein

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2023
2:19-cv-00594-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-00594-APG-EJY

01-04-2023

CANDY TORRES, Plaintiff v. ALLAN ROTHSTEIN and KYLE PUNTNEY, Defendants


ORDER

[ECF NO. 247]

ANDREW P. GORDON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Near the end of the trial, this case was stayed because defendant Allan Rothstein filed a bankruptcy petition. Plaintiff Candy Torres moved the bankruptcy court for relief from the automatic stay, requesting that the trial in this court be resumed and a judgment entered, after which Torres and Rothstein can return to the bankruptcy court for claims administration. In re Allan Nathan Rothstein, Case No. 22-13553-abl, ECF No. 17. The bankruptcy court granted that motion. ECF No. 245. Consequently, I set this matter for a status conference on January 18, 2023 to discuss completing the trial. ECF No. 246.

On January 3, 2023, Rothstein filed a “notice of removal” in which he appears to seek having the trial conducted in the bankruptcy court. ECF No. 247. To the extent that Rothstein is requesting that I refer the trial to the bankruptcy court, I deny that request. The trial before me is nearly completed and it would be a waste of time and resources to have the parties start over before the bankruptcy court. To the extent that Rothstein contends this matter is automatically referred to the bankruptcy court through Local Bankruptcy Rule 1001, I may withdraw the reference on my own motion “for cause shown.” 28 U.S.C. § 157(d). The “efficient use of judicial resources, delay and costs to the parties,” and “the prevention of forum shopping” weigh in favor of withdrawing the reference solely for purposes of concluding the trial. Vacation Vill., Inc. v. Clark Cnty., Nev., 497 F.3d 902, 914 (9th Cir. 2007) (quotation omitted). The “uniformity of bankruptcy administration” will not be undermined because Torres conceded in her motion before the bankruptcy court that any judgment she obtains in this court will be administered through the bankruptcy proceedings. Id. (quotation omitted).

I THEREFORE ORDER that defendant Allan Rothstein's “notice of removal” (ECF No. 247) is DENIED. The January 18, 2023 status conference will go forward and the trial will be completed in this court.

I FURTHER ORDER the clerk of the court to update Rothstein's address as follows and to mail a copy of this order to him at this address:

Allan Nathan Rothstein
8616 Canyon View Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89117

DATED this 4th day of January, 2023.


Summaries of

Torres v. Rothstein

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 4, 2023
2:19-cv-00594-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Torres v. Rothstein

Case Details

Full title:CANDY TORRES, Plaintiff v. ALLAN ROTHSTEIN and KYLE PUNTNEY, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 4, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-00594-APG-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 4, 2023)