From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. N.Y.C. Dep't of City Planning

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 79195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)

Opinion

Motion No. 2024-08719 Index No. 721/2024

11-27-2024

In the Matter of Luz Torres, et al., respondents, v. New York City Department of City Planning, et al., appellants.


Unpublished Opinion

MOTION DECISION

M301028

VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CARL J. LANDICINO, LAURENCE L. LOVE, PHILLIP HOM, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by the appellant New York City Department of City Planning for leave to appeal to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 2024, and, inter alia, to stay enforcement of so much of the order as granted the petitioners a temporary restraining order, pending hearing and determination of its appeal. Motion by the appellant Arrow Linen Supply Company, Inc. for leave to appeal to this Court from the order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 4, 2024, and, inter alia, to stay enforcement of so much of the order as granted the petitioners a temporary restraining order, pending hearing and determination of its appeal. Motion by the respondent Jay Goldberg for a preference in the determination of the motion by the appellant New York City Department of City Planning.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that the branches of the motions by the appellants New York City Department of City Planning and Arrow Linen Supply Company, Inc. which are for leave to appeal from the order are granted; and it is further, ORDERED that the branches of the motions by the appellants New York City Department of City Planning and Arrow Linen Supply Company, Inc. which are to stay enforcement of so much of the order as granted the petitioners a temporary restraining order are granted and enforcement of so much of the order as granted the petitioners a temporary restraining order is stayed, pending hearing and determination of the appeals on condition that the appeals are perfected on or before December 27, 2024; and it is further, ORDERED that in the event the appeals are not perfected on or before December 27, 2024, the Court, on its own motion, may vacate the stay, without further notice, or the respondents may move to vacate the stay, on three days notice; and it is further, ORDERED that the motions by the appellants New York City Department of City Planning and Arrow Linen Supply Company, Inc. are otherwise denied; and it is further, ORDERED that the motion by the respondent Jay Goldberg pro se for a preference in the determination of the motion by the appellant New York City Department of City Planning is denied as academic.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., LANDICINO, LOVE and HOM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Torres v. N.Y.C. Dep't of City Planning

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 2024
2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 79195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)
Case details for

Torres v. N.Y.C. Dep't of City Planning

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Luz Torres, et al., respondents, v. New York City…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 27, 2024

Citations

2024 N.Y. Slip Op. 79195 (N.Y. App. Div. 2024)