From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

April 15, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Herbert Shapiro, J.).


We perceive no abuse of discretion in the court's refusing to vacate the note of issue while permitting defendants to complete necessary outstanding disclosure, where the note of issue was not filed until almost a year after the preliminary conference and defendants claimed that due to their trial schedule and staff limitations they were unable to complete disclosure in a timely manner pursuant to the preliminary conference order (see, Smukler v 12 Lofts Realty, 178 A.D.2d 125).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Kupferman and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Torres v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 15, 1993
192 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Torres v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:DAVID TORRES, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1993

Citations

192 A.D.2d 400 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
596 N.Y.S.2d 66

Citing Cases

Scott v. Towers on the Park Condo.

ned erroneous facts including incorrect statement that discovery had been completed or waived); Nielsen v.…

Sanford Chiropractic, P.C. v. New S. Ins. Co.

]; James v New York City Transit Authority , 294 AD2d 471, 472 [2d Dept 2002] ). Notably, when the party…