From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2016
Case No. CV 14-02510 AB (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-02510 AB (RAO)

01-07-2016

JESSE TORRES, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 7, 2016

/s/_________

ANDRE BIROTTE JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Torres v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 7, 2016
Case No. CV 14-02510 AB (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2016)
Case details for

Torres v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:JESSE TORRES, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 7, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 14-02510 AB (RAO) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2016)