From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Torres v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 16, 2011
Case No. 3:08cv396/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv396/LAC/EMT.

February 16, 2011


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated November 3, 2010 (Doc. 28). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2010.


Summaries of

Torres v. McNeil

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Feb 16, 2011
Case No. 3:08cv396/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Torres v. McNeil

Case Details

Full title:JOSE OSVALDO TORRES, Petitioner, v. WALTER McNEIL, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Feb 16, 2011

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv396/LAC/EMT (N.D. Fla. Feb. 16, 2011)